Things I can do in Linux that I can't do on Windows.

Things I can do in Linux that I can't do on Windows.

Posted by dmartin on Sat, 03/03/2007 - 1:06pm in

Since I often hear from friends and people on the Internet about things they can't do in Linux that they could on Windows, I thought I'd write up a list of things I can do in Linux that I can't do in Windows. 

  1. Update every single piece of software on my system with a single action.  This is one of the main reasons I run Linux.  Sure, Windows has Windows Update, but that only updates the operating system, Office, and a few other things.  For every Linux distribution I've used (Gentoo, Red Hat, Suse, Ubuntu), updating is simple.  When you update, you have every application, every library, every script - every single piece of software upgraded automatically for you.  And on most of them, they will check for updates automatically and notify you.  This is great for security, fixing bugs quickly, and getting the latest in features.
  2. Update nearly everything on my computer without a reboot.  On Linux, there is only one thing that requires a reboot after updates.  The kernel.  And even then you can continue to run on the previous kernel.  You just need to reboot to get the benefit of using the new kernel (say, if it has a bug fix or a new feature).  In Windows, many of the updates to even non-critical software require reboots.
  3. Keep my system secure without software that consumes my system resources, requires my time, and frequently nags me.  Basic requirement for a secure Windows box include:
    1. Running antivirus protection.  AV software consumes resources and requires routine scans.
    2. A software firewall like ZoneAlarm or the one built into Vista that constantly asks you if you want to allow software to contact the Internet.  More time on your part.
    3. Running Adblock Adaware and/or Spybot Search & Destroy on a routine basis, consuming your time, and requiring your manual intervention.  People often forget or don't "get around to it".
    4. Never trusting software.  You have to go through life assuming every bit of software and every website on the Internet is going to screw you over.  What a sorry state of affairs that is.

    All of this requires your attention, slows your computer, and ruins the open experience of the Internet.  None of this is necessary in Linux.  You get your software through your distribution.  As long as you can trust your distribution, you can trust the software available.  Having a firewall is a good thing even in Linux, but most of us have a firewall built into our Cable and DSL modems, or our wi-fi router.  A software firewall in windows is as much used to keep malware from calling out as it is to keep outside intrusions from coming in, and you don't have the same concerns in Linux (since, as I said, you can trust your software).

  4. Run an entire operating system for free without pirating software, and without breaking the law.  Most Window's users seem to accept that breaking the law is okay, because it is pretty much required.  Either you break the law, or spend countless thousands of dollars on the software you need.  You may not think it is a big deal, but if you own a home like I do, you are putting it at risk.  While unlikely, the potential is there for software companies to come after you just like the RIAA has come after countless people.  With Linux, this isn't necessary.  You can run the software you need without paying for it, and without breaking the law.  I know I sleep better at night.
  5. Take my settings with me where ever I go.  In Linux, all your personal settings are stored in your Home folder, most in folders that begin with a period (like .gaim).  So, I can copy all these settings from one computer to another.  I can put these settings on a USB drive.  When I switched from Gentoo to Ubuntu, I kept all my settings.  On Windows, some settings are under your home folder and some are in the registry.  So your settings are not portable.
  6. Run Internet Explorer 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 7.0 on the same desktop.  I have all installed thanks to the wonderful IEs4Linux project.  I can even run them side-by-side if I want.  For a web developer, that's huge.  Testing browser compatibility to that level on Windows requires multiple machines or something like VMWare.  Further, when I run IE under Linux, I don't have to worry about any malware or virus getting onto my system.
  7. Understand everything that is going on in my computer.  Using Windows is like working with a black box.  You can see the outside, but you have no idea what is going on inside.  If you hit snags, your only option is to hope Microsoft fixes it.  Or, perhaps you can submit a bug report to Microsoft, spending your time improving software that  a company makes billions from.  Under Linux, you can look at the system logs, where you can see most issues.  You can search for the log messages on Google, and can usually track the cause and often find a fix.  If not, I can even go look at the source code to find the offending problem.  Granted, most people aren't capable or don't have the time to look at the source code.  But the fact that tens-of-thousands of geeks do is often very, very helpful.  And if you do spend the time filling out a bug report, you are helping other people just like yourself, not contributing your time to a rich software company.
  8. Customize every aspect of my desktop.  In Windows, you are more or less stuck with what you are given.  Sure, you can install buggy skinning engines, or you can pay Microsoft extra for the ability to put skins on your desktop.  But even these aren't very adaptive.  It's just a new coat of paint on the same desktop.  Under Linux, I can choose the window manager, the desktop environment, the theme, the GTK engine, the icon theme, the special effects (see Beryl or Compiz), the filesystem browser, and so on.  Nearly every aspect of the system has competitive options.  If you look around the internet at screenshots of various Linux desktops, you rarely see two that look the same. 
  9. Benefit from competition between projects for each system on my computer. As I mention in point 8, there are options for every aspect of the Linux desktop.  Not only is it fun to try the various options, but it leads to better software as multiple projects compete against each other to be the best.  Can you imagine competing printing backends, competing desktop environments, or competing USB mounting systems on Windows?  I've been a Linux user for 3 years now, and I've seen remarkable changes in systems used on the Linux desktop, from critical systems (XFree86 switched to X.Org, auto-mounting systems) to non-critical  (my CD-Rom eject button works!). 
  10. Run thousands of great pieces of software that only run on Linux.  Just like Windows, Linux has software that doesn't run on Windows.  Great pieces of software like Amarok, Bluefish, Neverball, Gnumeric, K3B, Beryl, gdesklets, and MythTV.  I know this is a chicken-and-egg point, where Windows has the exact same situation. Too often I hear "I can't switch to Linux because it doesn't run [insert Windows software]".  My reason for pointing it out is just to make it clear that this is a two-way street.
  11. Learn about, support, and appreciate the value of free software.  I believe free software is important to us all.  Even if you use non-free software, the free software movement ensures checks and balances on non-free software by offering an alternative.  By running a free operating system and becoming involved in the community, I've contributed to free software, even if only in a small way.

 

The main point I frequently try to make is that you can't expect features to be 1-to-1 when switching operating systems.  We like Adobe Photoshop or Microsoft Office because we have used it for years, and we are used to it.  We hate change.  It's natural that people have a desire for everything to be identical.  Did we expect Windows to be exactly like something else when we started using it?  Probably not.

When you learn closed-source proprietary software like Photoshop or Office, you have spent your time indenturing yourself to a lifetime of spending $700 every so many years.  And the same goes for every company you work for that you insist you need Office or Photoshop.  And if you don't think that your company's expenses affect your salary, think again.

Conversely, if you take the time to learn open and free systems like Linux, Gimp, or OpenOffice, you now have given yourself a lifetime of perpetually free software.  The value of that is quite profound.  No more worrying about installing Office on more than one computer and running into activation issues.  I have OpenOffice installed on all 5 computers I own, and my flash drive where I can run it on any computer I wish.

Bottom line is, yes, you will have to spend time learning Linux and the software running on Linux if you choose to switch.  But by doing so, you've set yourself up for a lifetime of free computing.  For many of you, that's going to be 40, 50, 60, 70 years.  A period of learning isn't so hard to swallow, when you can see the value of doing so.

My advice, should you choose to try Linux, is to forget about making it exactly like Windows.  You will spend countless hours, and you will fail.  Once you spend signicant time on Linux, every time you use a Windows computer you will say "Bah, I could do xyz if I was on Linux". 

If you are a Linux user, and you have other things you think should be on this list, please contribute comments below.

A very thourough and

A very thourough and insightful analysis of the benefits of Linux vs. Windows without a lot of opinionated points. Great job!

Posted by Tavis (not verified) on Sun, 03/04/2007 - 10:13am
I run both Winxp and Fedora7
I run both Winxp and Fedora7 on my 1.7Ghz P4 system. But Xp runs faster and smoother than fedora, but fedora requires a comparatively minimal hardware when compared. Wats the problem could be..
Posted by Vijay.M (not verified) on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 12:28am
Its because fedora is a
Its because fedora is a buggy piece of crap that's a nudered proprietary version of linux (red hat). And your probably running KDE or Gnome which are too bulky for any comp. Try xfce or one of those *box ones desktop environments.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/09/2007 - 8:59am
i run kubuntu 7.10 on
i run kubuntu 7.10 on pentium3 733Mhz with 768ddr1 ram and nvidia fx5200 with 128mb ram i also installed on kubuntu beryl and compiz fusion smoothly...
Posted by firmis132 (not verified) on Tue, 01/22/2008 - 6:43am
One little flaw ... You
One little flaw ... You mention you don't have to break the law yet in the next breath you mention you use multiple versions of IE on the same box. Are you sure you have a license for each one. You may notice that using MS libraries require an MS license. Now libraries from multiple windows OS sources requires as many licenses.
Posted by Giorgis (not verified) on Mon, 01/21/2008 - 1:59am
First off, you are making a

First off, you are making a big assumption that I am breaking the law (which I am not).  Why is assuming the worst so easy for everyone?  And why is it any of your business anyway?

Second off, I don't need multiple Window's licenses for multiple versions of IE, simply because Windows itself can't do the same feat.  I own more than one copy of Windows that I didn't want.

dmartin's picture
Posted by dmartin on Tue, 01/22/2008 - 12:25am
Whenever you execute the IE
Whenever you execute the IE installer script, you must agree to the EULA. Did you forget?
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 02/07/2008 - 6:43pm
Very nice list! Neverball

Very nice list!
Neverball has a windows version.

BTW... you might want to disable full html for anonymous users.
Go Ubuntu, go drupal :)

Posted by Love Calculator (not verified) on Wed, 03/14/2007 - 9:50pm
I had a very slow computer a
I had a very slow computer a while ago at work. I ran 'vmstat 1' to see what it was doing, and I noticed that the interrupts where 20k, a factor 10 over what they usually are. So I did 'watch cat /proc/interrupts' and could see that the videocard was sending all those interrupts. I stopped the X-server, so came back to a text-console, and the interrupts where still going strong. I rebooted into text mode, and the interrupts were gone. Anyway, I had to upgrade the nvidia-driver. But I knew it was the graphics because of all the information available! I wouldn't know where to get all that info in windows.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 12:20am
processexplorer for
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 1:32am
I have been using Linux for
I have been using Linux for over 10 years and I wouldn't have a clue what to do in that kind of situation. Never heard of vmstat or catting /proc/interrups.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 12:56am
Unfortunately one point
Unfortunately one point isn't quite correct, you can run numerous IE's on Windows in parallel... A quick Google will show you this. Otherwise you make some good points.
Posted by Seopher (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 2:43pm
You can too run all the IE's
You can too run all the IE's in Linux side by side! I have Used Linux Since i was 12 as i was wanting to open a Computer shop i felt i had to learn Linux and mac. anyways so your 1 problem is your own problem no one elses! P.S Dude you have Great points i showing this to my Windows user friends who say its to hard to dual Boot your system and try it. p.s.s Dual Booting is so

easy!!

The-Wise-Man
Posted by The-Wise-Man (not verified) on Wed, 06/20/2007 - 10:26am
I would add a number 12: I
I would add a number 12: I don't need to find the drivers for almost every piece of software when installing new hardware or the OS itself. Almost everything is already supported. What is not in the kernel is very easy to add via the package manager and very little hardware is not at all supported. And a number 13: I can have multiple users logged in at the same time, all using their own desktop environment and applications. This is a feature that I really can't do without.
Posted by Gray (not verified) on Thu, 03/15/2007 - 11:33am
I think you can log in
I think you can log in multiple users in Windows at the same time too, win-L to switch.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/23/2007 - 10:27pm
Yeah, but in Linux they can
Yeah, but in Linux they can all use it at the same time... I can use my applications installed on my home computer, whilst my girlfriend is using it from a laptop... In Windows you need to have the Server version to do this which is expensive to say the least.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 1:13pm
You don't need a server
You don't need a server version to run multiple users on the same system, a simple change in the registry and you are running a multi version of windows. :) Don't get me wrong I Love Linux, Fedora user currently, but I actually Like Windows a lot too.
Posted by Bill Wilson (not verified) on Fri, 05/18/2007 - 11:16pm
but they cant work at the
but they cant work at the same time in the computer, and if you remote log into the system you kick of the currently log on user. use linux, windows is for games
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2007 - 4:24pm
Umm. No. I'm running XP Pro
Umm. No. I'm running XP Pro on my home theater PC and we watch movies while I'm using the system via remote desktop from my Linux laptop. The TV is running as the "media" user and I'm logged in as the admin user.
Posted by J Wynia (not verified) on Fri, 05/11/2007 - 7:39am
Then you modified XP to
Then you modified XP to allow you to do this. In the Group Policy editor the option to allow multiple Terminal Services users is there, but does not do anything until you replace one of the TS libraries with one from 2003 Server... Without hacking only versions of Server allow simultaneous logins. Well, maybe some version of Vista does too, who knows.
Posted by Dan (not verified) on Tue, 05/15/2007 - 9:56am
without hacking? Not hardly,
without hacking? Not hardly, simple registry change gives XP full multi user capabilities. Too bad some people will never admit when they are wrong! Do you have to make any changes to run multi users in Linux? YES depending on your distro, some changes can be a real pain. What about running multiple desktops out of the box? Didnt think so...
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/18/2007 - 11:28pm
I am running Linux, and can
I am running Linux, and can run multiple desktops, on an out-of-the-box system. My system supports 6 Command line logins at this machine (at the same time.) and at least four extra graphical logins, even by remote from pretty much anywhere. Now, Mr Anonymous, maybe linux users have to make some changes to get the best out of multiple desktops, but Linux has always been multi-user and has always supported multiple logins simultaneously. Until XP, with it's pseudo multi-user capability, Windows was (and still is.) a single-user system, and can be completely trashed by anyone with a login ID. (I got booted from the school network for this.). Back on topic. Things I can do in Linux that I can't do in Windows... * Recognising the hardware I normally use. It took two days of searching to find the drivers for my scanner, the Linux box recognised it instantly and was able to use it. * Develop my programs without BSOD during compile/execute. * Burn DVDs. I only *yesterday* managed to get a decent piece of DVD burning software for Windows. In Linux, while it also didn't come as stock, it took me thirty seconds, including downloading time. * Customise every part of my experience. * Enjoy using my PC. Have a nice day, everybody. Even you, Mr. Anonymous.
Posted by James P. (not verified) on Thu, 05/31/2007 - 1:17pm
"without hacking? Not
"without hacking? Not hardly, simple registry change" Uhm. That *is* hacking. Microsoft does not intend for you to use Windows XP Pro as a server; if you actually read the End User License Agreement, you will find that they have, in fact, forbidden you to do so. And in the USA, that's a Federal crime (not that it's likely to ever be enforced, but still, it's not something *I want to have to worry about) under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.
Posted by Morely Dotes (not verified) on Mon, 06/11/2007 - 4:24pm
Thankfully in the country I
Thankfully in the country I live in, (the UK), although you are not allowed to reverse engineer windows, it is perfectly fine to use XP in another way (ie as a server) provided you do not break copyright laws, this is fair use (protected by english law) however I would just use linux, because its easier and not aboard some grey area of law.
Posted by Anonymous88 (not verified) on Sat, 09/29/2007 - 1:06pm
I'm running multiple
I'm running multiple desktops almost out of the box... all i had to do was open a 2nd Xserver (ubuntu gusty) and how about using different video cards at the same time, with different Desktop Environments and even different OSes (openvz) there is no possible way to do all that on windows. and even if you did by the time you got everything setup to run with any kind of stability you could get a virus and have to start over so before you open your mouth and speak words about linux that you dont know squat about please dont make yourself look dumb and just be quiet
Posted by Ubuntu - Gentoo - DSL user (not verified) on Wed, 09/26/2007 - 8:46pm
I too love Linux but not
I too love Linux but not complacently. When in 2003 I upgraded my mobo, I had a tough time finding linux drivers. On the face of this planet there is no hardware manufacturer who will dare to survive without bundling windows drivers for the chips. Anyways, around 2004-05 I got the drivers breeze started to blow ... but but but please save some thought for what I went through. OK Agreed this is not likely to repeat. Now in 2007 things in *nix zone are also fast. BTW, before using the package manager, the mandatory step is "Search the damn thing" and lucky you are, even if you know the corridors - Oh that is on a large scale average.
Posted by A. K. Sharma (not verified) on Thu, 05/03/2007 - 8:45am
The point is that a lot has
The point is that a lot has changed very quickly in the past four years or so, and there is no sign of a slow down. On the contrary, try upgrading to vista with an existing computer. If you are lucky, you may succeed. Driver support for vista sounds as if it may be worse than it used to be for linux. Some devices that claim vista compatibility include vista drivers that are not digitally signed, so the OS will not load them. See this Windows Secrets article. It may be true that hardware manufacturers must support the Windows OS today, and I do not see this changing significantly any time soon, but the days when they can ignore Linux have passed so industry support for the OS can only improve.
Posted by Ernie (not verified) on Fri, 05/11/2007 - 12:13pm
Yes, open software is the
Yes, open software is the best thing that has happened since the invention of the wheel, sliced pizza and home baked chocolate chip cookies! :D Thanks to open software even great sites with great authors (like this one) are possible without going bankrupt. Thanks Linux, thanks Drupal, Thanks Open source community... but thanking is not enough we should equally give what we have taken whenever we can. We are not only making the internet a better place, we are making the "World" better. Cheers !
Posted by Manny (not verified) on Sun, 04/01/2007 - 9:09am
Awesome list. And game
Awesome list. And game companies are starting to think about making games for Linux. The need for windows is almost over.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 5:41pm
How about the greatest
How about the greatest advantage of them all: live-cd distros. Not only can Knoppix automatically detect and boot on nearly any PC, it does not alter the contents of the harddrive (if there is one) and can be customized as well.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 7:13pm
My only real objection to
My only real objection to switching over to Linux for everyday use is the horrendous support for my ATi card. Even if I could use Wine or Cedega to run my games under Linux, they'd still look like crap because the system has no idea how to use my card. Not that it's anybody's fault (except, perhaps, ATi's), but I find myself pulling back to Windows again and again because I don't want to give up gaming, and as long as I'm booted in I might as well do whatever else I need to do in Windows, too. Oh, and the NTFS support is still sketchy... with a hard drive full of media I use on a daily basis formatted in NTFS - and it's 500 gigs, so it's not easy to back up at all and reformat - I really don't want a read error or a write error while I'm in Linux. If they fix these two problems, then I'll switch over, no problem... until then, Windows still has me by the throat.
Posted by Just Another Victim of the Ambient Morality (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 8:29pm
Heh, not to point out the
Heh, not to point out the obvious, but if your favourite graphics card manufacturer doesn't support your favourite operating sytsem, maybe you should swap favourites somewhere :)
Posted by Jack (not verified) on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 2:51am
Have a look at ntfs-3g for
Have a look at ntfs-3g for read/write of NTFS under linux, and see ext2ifs for r/w of ext2/3 formatted disks natively under windows. http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/ext2ifs.htm
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/24/2007 - 9:19pm
I just learned that ext2fs
I just learned that ext2fs only supports 32-bit Windows. :-(
Posted by Scott (not verified) on Mon, 05/07/2007 - 11:43pm
NTFS support is golden-
NTFS support is golden- check out ntfs-3g.org and NTFS-config for a GUI for the settings. A year ago, there wasn't a good solution- now there is.
Posted by Steve (not verified) on Wed, 04/25/2007 - 11:43am
Things like that (haven't
Things like that (haven't tried it, so if it works...) should be a part of the OS and not something that you've got to already know about. I've never heard of that before (not that it means much), but the critical type of things should either be high-profile (NTFS support doesn't really fit that) or part of the OS. e.g. Audacity is high profile enought that it doesn't need to be included, whereas SAMBA is included.
Posted by Ryan Smyth (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2007 - 9:09am
I think what you are saying
I think what you are saying is that NTFS support should be built into a given Linux install since it's critical? And if not built-in, then it should be a high-profile package so people will install it straight away? I disagree. If ntfs-3g (or something else) is built-in in the future, great, since I use it all the time. If not, it's a very simple "emerge ntfs-3g" away, so either way I win. And as for high-profile, if you know you need or want NTFS support, it's pretty darn simple to type "linux ntfs support" into Google. The very first result is an entire site dedicated to this very topic.
Posted by Dan (not verified) on Tue, 05/15/2007 - 10:04am
As to the ATI
As to the ATI thing: envy That will deal with most ATI drivers.
Posted by VRP (not verified) on Mon, 04/30/2007 - 12:08pm
I have an ATI 9100 IGP that
I have an ATI 9100 IGP that ATI themselves says that it will never have 3d support in linux. Not even with there drivers. That's too bad... My graphics works out of the box with the open drivers perfectly. Compiz Fusion and all. Time to play catchup ATI.
Posted by Jason Brower (not verified) on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 11:40am
One big stumbling block for
One big stumbling block for me with using Linux (Ubuntu) was the hassle with my wireless newtwork card. If I could've understood that whole thing, i might be running Linux today.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2007 - 10:11am
Try madwifi it solved all my
Try madwifi it solved all my wireless problems a few minutes after I heard about it.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2007 - 4:31am
I think Feisty Fawn has
I think Feisty Fawn has addressed the issues with WiFi that I had with Dapper Drake. I loaded FF on my wife's older Toshiba laptop a month ago and it worked like a charm.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2007 - 1:35pm
One day you're gonna wish
One day you're gonna wish you HAD backed up those 500 gigs of media, regardless.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2007 - 6:24pm
A very timely take on the
A very timely take on the things that one CAN do with Linux. I've been a OpenSuse user for over a year now and a complete convert. One other point - a 14 if you will. There are a lot of Linux apps which are inherently superior to anything you can find for Windows. Software like; Amarok (it rocks), almost any video software, Open Office, the already mentioned k3b, Konqueror, and the list goes on. I've forgotten what using Windows used to be like except I have to put up with it at work. Oh well, one of these days that may change as well.....
Posted by Andy (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 8:56pm
Great list! I love that I
Great list! I love that I could remap my Marble Mouse Trackball in Linux. I can't do that in Windows. In Linux I can hold down the small left button and roll the ball to scroll side-to-side or up and down. I set the small right button as a middle click so I can use the Linux highlight and paste trick. (Something else I can't do in Windows.) In Windows all I can do with this trackball is what Logitec has laid out for me. That means no side scrolling. The small left button only scrolls up and the small right button only scrolls down. I realize this is probably an esoteric example, but it goes to show just how configurable Linux is. It's a marvel of software engineering as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by Mike (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 11:26pm
I couldn't believe I was
I couldn't believe I was reading this article when I found it through StumbleUpon. This is almost exactly word for word, a conversation (argument) I was having with a Windows drone IT buddy of mine. I won the argument by pulling out the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) trump card. And he actually tried to argue that I couldn't run certain apps. I countered that with Wine, Virtualbox, adding that these could help me run the VERY few Windows apps that i needed. I still have an all XP box, but nowadays Linux gets most of my internet usage.
Posted by PCTuneUpGuy (not verified) on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 11:39pm
well for those who don't
well for those who don't know "wine like" apps could look like a cool solution, but when it really comes to "I want my Windows XYZ application run on linux using wine" you find a lot of bugs or application unsupported at all. Good example is Adobe Photoshop. So maybe your Windows buddy was right ;)
Posted by I.S. (not verified) on Sun, 05/13/2007 - 2:43pm
I agree. I love linux like
I agree. I love linux like everybody else. But I'm a gamer and can't seem to get alot of my favorite games to work with WINE or any other emulator out there. I truly hope that game companies start releasing games for linux. I personally feel theres a steep learning curve for users wanting to know the command line part of linux. Theres nothing worse than typing a command thats about a paragraph long only to get an error because you lower cased a letter when it should be caps. Not to defend windows or anything but i've had simple errors in linux that were a 2 day pain in the ass re-running configs and re-downloading through package manager. I also seem to recall rebooting quite a bit with my UBUNTU machine. After updates.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 1:49pm
use Gimp ;)
use Gimp ;)
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:35am
Thanks for this list (nice
Thanks for this list (nice header!), I'll use it to persuade people to migrate to Linux!
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/20/2007 - 4:08am